Re: Hey, what Su problem?
From: | Robert Hailman <robert@...> |
Date: | Saturday, December 8, 2001, 19:38 |
Adam Walker wrote:
>
> >From: jogloran <exponent@...>
> >Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 11:26:44 -0000
> >
> >>Great idea, like a language embargo, right? The pitfall is that we
> >won't be able to understand each other; most of us don't know how to
> >speak others' conlangs...
> >
>
> Well, since it's come to the point where i figure we've all memorized his
> three Answer:'s and our fifteen-twenty responses, I think we can more than
> make up for the loss of comprehension with the increase in FUN!
Fifteen to twenty responses? Well, I guess, but you can condense them
into four general catorgies:
1. Ambiguity is good.
2. You evidently don't know English, so stop preaching about its
problems.
3. You make no sense.
4. You're on the wrong list.
... or a combination of any number of these, but I've yet to see a
message that combines all four.
Let's be honest with ourselves. It's not that hard to guess which
category/ies a post in a conlang falls into, based on the context.
Anyroll, Adam, I'm completely behind your proposal. I haven't responded
to Su yet, but since I've always wanted to find out how to say "You make
no sense. Go subscribe to AUXLANG!" in Ajuk, I think I'll start now.
This'll be fun.
--
Robert
Reply