Re: Hey, what Su problem?

In a message dated 11.12.2001 03:52:15 PM, bc_@MAIL.RU writes:

>On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 22:19:37 +0100, daniel andreasson
><danielandreasson@...> wrote:
>
>>Hey! Couldn't we use some language that all of us understand,
>>like a... whaddyacallit... international auxilliary language
>>or something.
>>
>>No, wait... :-P
>
>:))))))
>
>I like this idea!
>
>ICAL: An Inter-Concultural Auxiliary Language, or alternatively
>Inherently Cryptic Artlangerish Lingo. (The abbreviature is already used
>for too many different things to bother about the rights, IMO)
>
>Easy for True Conlangers, undeciferable for the rest.
>
>I imagine Latino-Greek roots occurring in English, properly mutilated...
>VSO... trigger role marking, but underlyingly active-stative... consonant
>mutations arranged cyclically... loads of diacritics... :D
>
    ::shocked look:: Hey that _almost_ sounds like Lego, damnit!
    Well, the "Latino-Greek roots occurring in English, properly
mutilated...VSO" part at least... but that part about "underlying ac
tive-stative" might also apply - I think... I am not to clear on this ...
Clarity sought.


*gigglagoogolbyte*/*spassogoogolocteto*

Verfremdungseffekt << ostraneniye >>