Re: Hey, what Su problem?
From: | Adam Walker <dreamertwo@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 12, 2001, 10:57 |
>From: Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...>
>Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:24:04 -0500
>
>Yes! Glory to Ugh! All people shall speak Ugh!
>
>(Ugh is Uk after the [k]>["w] change (["w] is the velar approximant in CPA.
>I think the X-SAMPA sign is [R]))
>
>>No, wait... :-P
>
>That'd b Ugh in Ugh. Ugh ugh ugh! Ugh! Ugh ugh!
>
> Andreas/Ugh
Umm, Andreas, you for got the tone marks. Ugh has to be tonal or else you
end up with too many phonetic types and everyone knows that too many oral
actions will slow your thinking down! It's been proven by yet another
nameless Outer Slabavian linguist!
Ugh1 ugh4 ugh2 ugh1 ugh1 ugh5! (Which after tone sandhi becomes Ugh5 ugh2
ugh3 ugh5 ugh3 ugh2 ugh2.)
Adam/Ugh2
_________________________________________________________________
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com