>From: Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...>
>Reply-To: Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@...>
>To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
>Subject: Re: Romola instead of Romula?
>Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:25:16 -0500
>
>Artem Kouzminykh wrote:
> > OK, then let this be Romula forever;-)
>
>Actually, I got to thinking, wouldn't an adjective form be used, La
>Lingua Romulica or something like that?
>
>--
>2 Wakalláf watyánivaf plal 273
>
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Conlang/W.html
>
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
>ICQ: 18656696
>AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at