Re: Morphems

David Peterson wrote:

>     Well, I never knew that "tsk" was supposed to be that sound...  I thought
> they were saying "tsk" or "tIsk".  In writing, I use "ntch" to convey that
> sound because it sounds more like it.
In German, it's usually transliterated as z-z-z or tz-tz-tz.  Anyway,
since it's an alveolar implosive, it just doesn't fit into any IE
orthographies.  I'm sure !Xu~ or whatever it's spelt like would have
a notation for it.


-- Christian Thalmann