Re: Unilang: the Morphology
From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
Date: | Saturday, April 21, 2001, 23:29 |
Hi!
Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...> writes:
> Henrik Theiling wrote:
> >Well, I would not consider it regular if number and case are mixed in
> >one ending. Yes, it would be inflecting because of this.
>
> So, according to your definition inflextion is irregular by definition?
Errrm, think think.... Yes. Inflection is irregular.
> >Why not? Russian has both `s' and `k' as prepositions. :-) And
> >prepositions are very close to case endings in agglutinating languages
> >(-> Finno-Ugric).
>
> I know of that Russian habit, but I thought they were just WRITTEN by
> themselves. If they're truly independent words, then I assume they're
> actually pronounced as [s@] and [k@], or perhaps [@s] and [@k]?
I think they are pronounced /s/ and /k/. If the preceding word ends
or the following start with a vowel, you might analyse that they are
pronounced *with* that word, but if not, they are clearly simply the
above phonemes as far as I know. But my Russian is too bad to
generate sentences.
**Henrik
Replies