En réponse à Tristan <kesuari@...>:
> >
> I can't say I'm familiar with the brand Sire...
>
LOL. Of course, it's a very exclusive brand ;)) .
> >
> Bah, third and second persons are perfectly appropriate for referring
> to
> oneself. First person for yourself is much too conventional...
>
Not when you use it to talk to yourself rather than refer to yourself ;))) .
> >>
> >True. We yourself stopped wondering about my sanity a long time ago
> (does it
> >make sense? It's not supposed to... :(( ). I know that I'm completely
> nuts. But
> >hey, we are all mad people in a constant state of hallucination. It
> just
> >happens that most of us hallucinate approximately the same thing most
> of the
> >time!! :)))
> >
> Can you back that up with any evidence?
>
Hehe, according to that theory, the very concept of evidence is meaningless,
since it's always something that passes through the filter of your senses. Who
knows if you're not hallucinating any evidence I could give you? ;)) (of
course, all this is unscientific as it is unprovable. But then that's the whole
fun of it :))) )
> >
> If you insist, crappy Christophe.
>
I prefer being crappy than problematic. At least the word is more
colourful ;))) .
> >
> I guess asking for a 'buck' in handwriting could be quite amusing for
> you, then...
>
LOL. Usually they are recognisable because my Bs stay above the baseline while
my Fs go below. But in fast handwriting my baseline is anything but straight
(not surprising with me ;))) ), so there can be confusions :)) .
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.