Christophe Grandsire wrote:
>En réponse à Tristan <kesuari@...>:
>
>>I can't say I'm familiar with the brand Sire...
>>
>LOL. Of course, it's a very exclusive brand ;)) .
>
And probably only in Europe, too.
>>Bah, third and second persons are perfectly appropriate for referring
>>to
>>oneself. First person for yourself is much too conventional...
>>
>Not when you use it to talk to yourself rather than refer to yourself ;))) .
>
Nah, because then you don't sound so much like you're talking to yourself...
>>>True. We yourself stopped wondering about my sanity a long time ago
>>>
>>>
>>(does it
>>
>>
>>>make sense? It's not supposed to... :(( ). I know that I'm completely
>>>
>>>
>>nuts. But
>>
>>
>>>hey, we are all mad people in a constant state of hallucination. It
>>>
>>>
>>just
>>
>>
>>>happens that most of us hallucinate approximately the same thing most
>>>
>>>
>>of the
>>
>>
>>>time!! :)))
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Can you back that up with any evidence?
>>
>Hehe, according to that theory, the very concept of evidence is meaningless,
>since it's always something that passes through the filter of your senses. Who
>knows if you're not hallucinating any evidence I could give you? ;)) (of
>course, all this is unscientific as it is unprovable. But then that's the whole
>fun of it :))) )
>
Can you back that up with any evidence? (See, now it comes clear I was
trying to be funny.)
>>If you insist, crappy Christophe.
>>
>I prefer being crappy than problematic. At least the word is more
>colourful ;))) .
>
Brown isn't terribly colorful...
Tristan.