Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: No more plural? No, more plural!

From:Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
Date:Saturday, August 13, 2005, 16:06
Hi!

Remi Villatel <maxilys@...> writes:
>... > /The teachers gave one book to the students./ > > How many books were given? Well, it depends on what the two "the" represent. >...
Well, I'd probably understand this as a single book in total. Anyway, I'd try to disambiguate this instead of saying it that way. E.g.: - The teachers gave one single book to the students. - Each teacher gave a book to the students. And also: - The teachers gave one single book to each student. - Each teacher gave a book to each student.
> That's why I decided to split the plural and the dual of Shaquelingua > in two. Now, Shaquelingua has a collective plural and a distributive > plural --as well as collective and distributive dual. > > Collective plural represents "all of the". > Distributive plural represents "each/every of the"
Yeah, that's a bit neater! In Qthyn|gai, I have 'number stacking', e.g., in analogy to 'case stacking', number endings may be stacked. There are many atomic number endings, including explicit 'collective', 'distributive'. Further, Qthyn|gai has number endings for 'expected amount', 'unexpected amount', 'known amount', 'unknown amount', 'explicitly unmentioned amount', 'regularly distributed', 'irregularly distributive', '1', '2', '3', 'not 1 (=general plural)', '0', 'absof*inglutely none', 'all', 'absof*inglutely all', 'many', 'quite many', 'very many', 'some', 'few', 'not so few'. I think that's about it... :-))) I had trouble coming up with Latin names for them. I have normal ones 'paucal', 'oligal', 'plural' but also 'latoligal' and 'tenuplural' and 'superomnial' and 'subnullar'. :-))) The list is here: http://www.theiling.de/conlang/s7/s_05.html#06_01
> /The:COLL teachers gave one book to the:COLL students./
Yeah, this is the same principle in Qthyn|gai.
> Only one book is given in this case. > > /The:DSTR teachers gave one book to the:COLL students./
Same. Both would be underspecified for the exact number. The dual you mention would be a stacked number: learn.cause.person.DUAL.COLL = (group of) two teachers learn.cause.person.DUAL.DISTR = (each of) two teachers
>... > One funny thing arising from my system is that the english expression > "all of the" must sometimes be translated into a distributive plural. > > /The:DSTR shaquean couples usually have 2:COLL children./ > = All the shaquean couples usually have 2 children.
Hmm?? They never bear single children? :-)) Otherwise just after the birth of one, there would be couples with only one child. Ok, ok, you said 'usually'. :-)))
>... > The usual questions: Wat d'ya think? ANADEW? >...
Probably. :-) At least in parts. Although I don't know whether there are languages that distinguish all four of dual collective, dual distributive, plural collective and plural distributive. **Henrik

Replies

tomhchappell <tomhchappell@...>
tomhchappell <tomhchappell@...>No more plural? No,more plural!:-- Gramm. Numbr when Non-Integer Semantic #