Re: Additional diacritics (was: Phonological equivalent of...)
From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
Date: | Thursday, February 8, 2007, 16:24 |
Hi!
T. A. McLeay writes:
>...
> (BTW: Isn't it about time CXS was deprecated anyway? Can we send
> messages in Unicode happily enough on this list nowadays?[*] ...
I don't think so. E.g. I am reading this on a text terminal that has
no idea about IPA. Second, I can read CXS much faster that IPA now
unless many diacritics are used. :-) And last but not least, I cannot
easily input IPA.
**Henrik
Reply