Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: partial letter replacement in languages?

From:Tristan Mc Leay <conlang@...>
Date:Friday, December 10, 2004, 11:34
On 10 Dec 2004, at 6.08 pm, Ray Brown wrote:

> On Thursday, December 9, 2004, at 09:25 , Philip Newton wrote: > >> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 02:48:04 +0200, Rodlox <Rodlox@...> wrote: >>> >>> is there a term for when a language is evolving/being changed, & >>> replaces >>> one letter with another (ie, /d/ becomes /t/) in nearly all >>> instances...yet >>> there are still words in the resultant language which retain (to >>> continue >>> the example) /d/ ? >> >> I don't know a term for it, > > Nor I - I do not think there is. Sound changes follow regular > patterns, so > the most appropriate tem is "exception". > >> but just wanted to note that some >> instances of this come when there are two (nearly) concurrent sound >> changes such that, say, /d/ becomes /t/ while, say, /D/ becomes /d/ -- >> so all or most original /d/'s disappeared but there are still /d/'s in >> the resulting language that used to be a different sound. > > Yes, but that is not what I understand Rodlox to mean. Where, to use > his > example, /d/ generally becomes /t/, but there are a few cases where the > original sound is kept, there will IMO be only two reasons: > - in certain environments the change is not made. For example in French > -tion is normally pronounced /sjO`/, but after a preceding /s/, the > /t/ is > not changed to /s/, so _question_ /kEstjO`/. > - a word is taken into the standard language from a dialect where the > change did not happen.
I think your assumption isn't quite right. There's all the SBrE-based dialects (like mine & RP) that have things like pass vs mass, or the standard English worn vs worm, sworn vs sword and selected dialects (like mine & at least some American) that usually modify /&/ before voiced elements, but don't in ablauted forms of verbs like ran and swam. Also most Melburnians at least pronounce 'gone' with a vowel not found in any other word, which perhaps represents an exception of the rising of the or/aw-vowel. These all make sense in terms of Roger's statement that sound changes proceed word-by-word. -- Tristan.

Reply

Rodlox <rodlox@...>