Re: Gnumin Phonology Sketch
From: | David Peterson <digitalscream@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, July 18, 2001, 8:51 |
In a message dated 7/17/01 10:53:05 PM, jdm314@AOL.COM writes:
<< It seems to me that a language wiht that many consonants and that few
vowels would very likely reinforce consonant phonemes with allophonic
vowel alternation. By way of example, I've often heard it said (and it's
been my experience) that you can recognize an Arabic emphatic consonant
more by the pronunciation of the adjacent vowels than by the consoant
itself! >>
This is true, for the variety of Arabic I was taught initially, and
which, therefore, I speak. Some examples:
"where" [?ejn] vs. "eye/fountain/letter 'ayn'" [?>Ajn] (I don't know how
else to show a voiced, phyryngeal fricative; I just made up ?>) The vowels
are the same; that's just how they come out.
I can't think of any other minimal pairs... For what it's worth:
"teacher" [d&:rIs] vs. "soldier" [d>A:bIt>]
"letter t" [t&:] vs. "student" [t>A:lIb]
Oooh, stomach hurts... No more examples.
-David
Reply