Re: Cardinals and ordinals
From: | Tristan McLeay <zsau@...> |
Date: | Friday, September 12, 2003, 14:54 |
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Isidora Zamora wrote:
> (English "third" is derived irregularly and "first" and "second"
> appear not to be derived at all from the corresponding cardinals.
/me pipes up for poor forgotten fifth!
('First' originally meant something like 'foremost'. 'Second' is, of
course, a borrowing. I imagine you know this already but I'm just bringing
it up because I didn't want a one-line post.)
--
Tristan <kesuari@...>
Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog. Tomorrow I'll probably still
be a dog. Sigh! There's so little hope for advancement.
-- Snoopy