Re: Cardinals and ordinals
From: | H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...> |
Date: | Friday, September 12, 2003, 18:37 |
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:47:07AM -0400, Isidora Zamora wrote:
[snip]
> What sorts of ways do various languages have of forming the ordinal
> numerals? (I'm especially interested in processes that are different from
> the ones that I have seen.)
[snip]
In Ebisedian, cardinals are formed by prefixing the modified noun onto the
quantitive form of the number (see my other mail for an explanation of
quantitive numbers). E.g.:
_juli'r_ "house"
_3Pei'_ "5" (qt.)
==> _3juli'roPei_ "5 houses"
Ordinals are simply the reverse process: prefix the number onto the noun:
_Peojuli'r_ "the 5th house"
It might be instructive to note that this prefixing process is in fact the
same process used to form compound words. E.g.,
_bis33'di_ "person"
_chari'_ "expression"
==> _bis33'dochari_ "personality" (lit. "human expression")
_ke'se_ "to cut"
_ga'ma_ "to call", "to name"
==> _kesoga'ma_ "to categorize" (cuttingly name; cutting as in
analysing, or dividing into categories; so to
categorize is to cut-and-name)
T
--
MSNBC, like CNN, has obviously decided to forgo anything that might: 1)
Require more than 10 minutes; 2) Involve serious discussion; 3) Use up time
anchors can spend drooling over the killing capacity of a Bradley tank. --
Vinay Menon, Toronto Star