Re: New Try from a New Guy
| From: | Christian Thalmann <cinga@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Sunday, December 15, 2002, 13:26 |
|---|
--- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Johansson <and_yo@H...> wrote:
> Christian Thalmann wrote:
> >If you're just going for a general unarticulated central sound,
> >I'd suggest to use /@/ to represent it. [@\], [3], [3\], [6]
> >etc are basically just "flavored" versions of the schwa [@].
> >I don't think any language distinguishes between those
> >phonemically (although Portuguese has two separate unstressed
> >central sounds: [1] and [6]).
>
> What about German _Fische_ [fIS@] vs _Fischer_ [fIS6]?
True. Funny how you can stumble over your own doorstep if
you search the horizon. ;-)
Hey, I should coin that as a saying in Jovian or Obrenje...
|Con man pficta hoerdzondun, poesse tzolber suo limi pordi.|
[kAm mam "pfiCt@ har"dzAnd@n pas "tsAlb@r su "li:mi "bArdi]
when MAN look_at:3s horizon:ACCs can:3s stumble:INF
POS:3s:n:OBLs threshold:OBLs door:GENs
|Blize deweq u kelraze, nok tse nim urefwel furoldac.|
[bli:Z d@"wEN M kEl"ra:Z nOk tS# nim Mr@"fwEl fMrOl"dax]
when_REL search:LIQ:0 PRE horizon happen:3e TSE
POS:RFL doorstep stumble:0
-- Christian Thalmann