Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: New Try from a New Guy

From:H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...>
Date:Saturday, December 14, 2002, 18:11
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 09:58:00AM -0800, Michael David Martin wrote:
[snip]
> 2. I understand the differences between phones and phonemes, but I'm not > sure if I should be putting [ ] or / / around the sounds in the above chart. > For example, I'm using [3] and representing it with uh, but when I listen to > the sounds on the IPA web site the sounds [@], [3], [6] and [V] all sound > close enough to me to be the same letter. I can hear the differences, I just > don't think the differences are big enough. So, I would consider these four > phones to be a single phoneme, correct? But if I write /3/ how does someone > else know that [@], [3], [6] and [V] are all included?
[snip] You could list [@], [3], [6], [V] as allophones, and say that they correspond to the same phoneme, /3/. T -- Music critic: "That's an imitation fugue!"

Replies

Michael David Martin <mdmartin@...>
Michael David Martin <mdmartin@...>Another stab at the vocalic nightmare