Re: New Try from a New Guy
From: | H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@...> |
Date: | Saturday, December 14, 2002, 18:11 |
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 09:58:00AM -0800, Michael David Martin wrote:
[snip]
> 2. I understand the differences between phones and phonemes, but I'm not
> sure if I should be putting [ ] or / / around the sounds in the above chart.
> For example, I'm using [3] and representing it with uh, but when I listen to
> the sounds on the IPA web site the sounds [@], [3], [6] and [V] all sound
> close enough to me to be the same letter. I can hear the differences, I just
> don't think the differences are big enough. So, I would consider these four
> phones to be a single phoneme, correct? But if I write /3/ how does someone
> else know that [@], [3], [6] and [V] are all included?
[snip]
You could list [@], [3], [6], [V] as allophones, and say that they
correspond to the same phoneme, /3/.
T
--
Music critic: "That's an imitation fugue!"
Replies