Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: The difficulties of being weirder than English

From:Sally Caves <scaves@...>
Date:Friday, May 28, 2004, 1:52
----- Original Message -----

Peter Bleackley wrote:

> > I have an idea for a language, provisionally entitled "the Coastal > > Language", whose (human) speakers have a deeply-entrenched cultural idea > > that everything has a natural quantity. Its nouns belong to genders > > determined by the natural quantity, and each gender has its own number > > system. The corporeal gender contains items such as body parts whose > > natural number is considered to be two, so the singular form has been > > absorbed into the dual.
> What about Noses, Torsos, Heads, and the like?
> > That's an interesting question. I haven't entirely decided. One
possibility
> > is that they would belong to a different gender, for things that usually > > occur singly. Another is that they would be assimilated to the corporeal > > gender by analogy with other body parts. A third is that gender
assignment
> > of such body parts would be irregular. This possibility gains bonus
points
> > for being the most evil ;-)
> Or it could be based on semantics: things that normally occur in pairs > (like hands) would be assumed to be dual while things that normally > occur singly (like heads) would be assumed to be singular, as long as > the context didn't demand the other interpretation. Hooray for ambiguity!
Hooray indeed. Now leaving aside the human corporeal for a moment, Peter, would you apply your system to the animal and plant world? Leaves tend to divide up into threes and fives if they are monocots; for the insect world where legs are six; for arachnids, crabs and their relatives and octopi eight (I take it this is a coastal culture!); and for a great number of natural things--forests, grass, stars, swarms of flies, stones, flocks of birds, grains of sand, dust moats, etc.--infinitude? I'm new again, to the list, so if you've already discussed this, forgive me. It seems that you could have a gender for singulars, duals, triples, quintuples, octuples, and infinites, making it very evil indeed. :) Sally Caves (back again after a long absence) scaves@frontiernet.net http://www.frontiernet.net/~scaves/whatsteo.html Al eskkoat ol ai sendran

Replies

Peter Bleackley <peter.bleackley@...>
Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>