| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thursday, May 27, 2004, 16:43 |
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 04:13:34PM +0100, Peter Bleackley wrote:> I did experiment with a complex base once, just for the sheer mathematical > mischief of it, but I stuck to base 1+i.1-i is even better. No need for a negative sign or separate real/imaginary components; with just a string of (base 2) digits you can represent any complex number. :) -Mark