Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Poll by Email No. 11

From:And Rosta <a-rosta@...>
Date:Saturday, May 18, 2002, 21:32
Ray:
> At 10:48 am -0500 18/5/02, Peter Clark wrote: > [snip] > > Thus: what marks the extent of your conlang endeavors? > > I have created one or more... > > A. "Polished" a priori conlangs. > > B. "Functionally complete" a priori conlangs. > > C. "Functionally incomplete" a priori conlangs. > > D. My conlang(s) have not even made it to the editing room yet. > > A bit tough on those of us whose conlangs have all been to a lesser or > greater extent a_posteriori :=(
I'd originally asked about a priori lgs, because of course with a posteriori a lot comes ready made; it's a lot easier to reach functional completeness.
> I can't even answer 'yes' to D.
Why would BrSc not allow you to answer D? --And.

Reply

Raymond Brown <ray.brown@...>