Ray:
> At 10:48 am -0500 18/5/02, Peter Clark wrote:
> [snip]
> > Thus: what marks the extent of your conlang endeavors?
> > I have created one or more...
> > A. "Polished" a priori conlangs.
> > B. "Functionally complete" a priori conlangs.
> > C. "Functionally incomplete" a priori conlangs.
> > D. My conlang(s) have not even made it to the editing room yet.
>
> A bit tough on those of us whose conlangs have all been to a lesser or
> greater extent a_posteriori :=(
I'd originally asked about a priori lgs, because of course with
a posteriori a lot comes ready made; it's a lot easier to reach
functional completeness.
> I can't even answer 'yes' to D.
Why would BrSc not allow you to answer D?
--And.