Re: Poll by Email No. 11

On Saturday 18 May 2002 14:46, Raymond Brown wrote:
> At 10:48 am -0500 18/5/02, Peter Clark wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >        Thus: what marks the extent of your conlang endeavors?
> >        I have created one or more...
> >        A. "Polished" a priori conlangs.
> >        B. "Functionally complete" a priori conlangs.
> >        C. "Functionally incomplete" a priori conlangs.
> >        D. My conlang(s) have not even made it to the editing room yet.
>
> A bit tough on those of us whose conlangs have all been to a lesser or
> greater extent a_posteriori   :=(
>
> I can't even answer 'yes' to D.
        Hmm...Well, And was interested in a priori, but if you want to want to
answer "E. I prefer a posteriori conlangs, you heartless brute," I will add
that option. :)
        :Peter