Re: My Conlang Museum in Netscape too

Vasiliy wrote:

> 1) Did you use any consequential set of phonetic rules
> while deriving Rinya Nofo/Middle Rinya Naefo roots from
> the Latin ones? (It seems that you did, and I like this
> type of stuff :) ).
Yes, but I doubt I'll find the notes. Maybe if I dig *really*
deep...

> 2) There seems to be some confusion in the table of Mrin
> pronouns: the 1sg _ka_ (appearing in examples) is lacking,
> and 'exclusive/inclusive' is applied to 2nd person
> (including the singular).
Oops... I must have been very confused when I wrote that.
I should really change that, shouldn't I?

> 3) Why don't you expose your materials in Swedish? You
> shouldn't deprive your fellow conlangers of an occasion
> to practise Swedish *free* ;)
Well, I hardly write anything conlangy in Swedish anymore.
No one who is interested in conlanging knows Swedish, but
almost everyone knows English, so...
I can hardly think in conlanging terms in Swedish. In fact,
I write and read so much English on this list, that whenever
I'm thinking about e-mails that I'm going to right, I think
in English. It has happened that I have written e-mails to
Swedish friends and halfway through them I realize that I've
written in English. Scary actually.

> <quote>All exceptional</quote>,
I hope you don't mean my conlangs. They are embarrassingly
simple compared to y'alls langs out there. I really should
be working on Rinya or Laranao to come up with something
that I can be *proud* of showing you guys.

Daniel