Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: New Conlang: Þrjótran

From:R A Brown <ray@...>
Date:Tuesday, April 4, 2006, 19:51
Benct Philip Jonsson wrote:
> R A Brown skrev:
[snip]
>> AE became monophthongized in unaccented syllables in Republican >> times, i.e. during the 1st cent BCE. It spread to accented syllables >> during the 1st cent CE. >> >> The change was to [E]. i.e. as Philip says, it merged with short e. > > > But strangely Germanic borrowed CAESAR as *kaisar, cf. > German Kaiser and Old English cásere, where á /A:/ < *ai.
The retention of initial /k/ does strongly suggest that these are learned borrowings, or remodelings. We could also expect a "posh" learned pronunciation of this name/title to be used which was archaic by normal spoken standards. The initial sound of Russian Tsar' shows a derivation from spoken form (I am not competent to comment whether Russian -ar' would reflect /Eri/ or not).
> h less common OE also merged with [e:], long e, at about the same > >> time. >> >> On the other hand, AV (au) was retained in Vulgar Latin, and still >> survives in Romanian. It generally monophthongized in Romance langs, >> but the treatment is not uniform and is post-VL. > > > What about Claudius/Clodius and plaustrum/plostrum? > I understand this was perceived as a *dialectal* > difference by the ancients,
It was - it was confined, as far as we know, to rural dialects in north & central Italy.
> but probably a social > rather than a regional dialect, since it attracted > such ridicule.
Because the dialects were _rustic_ ones. Urban dwellers IME always tend to make fun of 'country bumpkins'. One thing lower class urbanites do *not* want to sound like are 'country bumpkins' or 'yokels'!
> But how widespread may it have been, > and is it connected to AV > o in Western Romance?
There is no evidence that it is connected with AV > O in the various Romance langs; its retention in Romanian (and Brittonic borrowings) and its different treatment in the various Romance langs make it clear IMO that the diphthong was retained in VL. I think the "regional country bumpkin" stigma would have been enough to ensure /o/ did not become widespread in VL, whatever the social rank of the speaker :) -- Ray ================================== ray@carolandray.plus.com http://www.carolandray.plus.com ================================== MAKE POVERTY HISTORY

Reply

Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...>