Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: English [dZ]

From:R A Brown <ray@...>
Date:Saturday, December 10, 2005, 15:29
Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On 12/9/05, R A Brown <ray@...> wrote:
[snip]
>> >>Precisely - after 1066, Norman French spelling conventions replaced the >>Old English ones. > > > Was it just a spelling convention change?
Yes.
> I thought that words which > previously had |j| began to be pronounced with |dZ|; they can't all be > reanalyzed spelling-pronunciations, can they?
Not as far as native words are concerned. the Old English [j] was spelled |g| and occurred before front vowels. In the post-Norman spelling it was denoted either with |y| or with the Old English version of |g| which we call yogh. The English initial [j] never became [dZ] The Vulgar Latin [j] however had become [dj] or [dz] in the proto-Romance period. When French words came to us spelled |j| or 'soft g' the sound was already [dZ]. English has not changed it.
> >>No. In Old French |j| was pronounced /dZ/, and |ch| was pronounced /tS/. [...] In France the >>earlier affricates were leveled to simple fricatives sometime in the middle of the13th >>century. > > > Huh. Wouldn't have guessed that - I can see /j/ -> /Z/ -> /dZ/, but > /j/ -> /dZ/ -> /Z/ is not exactly a monotonic-feeling sequence.
Mis-spelling in the late Roman period make it quite clear that the Latin /j/ (which was always geminate between vowels) had become an affricate in Vulgar Latin.
> > As far as I can tell, 1066 is about 500 years before the consistent > use of |I| and |J| to distinguish the vocalic and consonantal sounds, > so I'm assuming there was a significant period when both French and > English (to whatever extent it was written at all) had words spelled > with an |I| that was pronounced [dZ]. True?
Absolutely. I think Tristan has covered other points I might have made. -- Ray ================================== ray@carolandray.plus.com http://www.carolandray.plus.com ================================== MAKE POVERTY HISTORY