Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Questions about Hungarian

From:Racsko Tamas <tracsko@...>
Date:Thursday, May 6, 2004, 19:24
On 5 May 2004 vehke <vaksje@...> wrote:

> > (/a/, /o/, /u/, /3/) or "palatal" (front) ones (/a/, /E/, /i/,
> /a/ occurs as both a back and a front vowel (perhaps you meant /A/)? > Could you perhaps give the corresponding UPA symbols?
Unfortunately I'm a horrible typist and a superficial proof-reader... I meant "palatal" /E/, /e/, /i/, the UPA symbols are: ä, e, i.
> According to Sammallahti, PU does have non-initial /i/ (UPA i), as in > the following examples (in UPA): > [...] > Yet, that doesn't explain the vowel change PU *-ti > *-tA (not to > mention becoming harmonic), apart from the _kĹŤli_ example. Hmm...
I've learned the discussion with Rob Haden, theat Sammallahti suppose harmonic front */i/ (UPA i) ~ back */1/ (UPA i with breve below) pair in place of neural /e/ of the Hungarian school. According to this Sammallahti's PU *-ti should be rather harmonic *-ti/t1. The other problems still exist. However, do you and Rob study the same Sammallahti? Rob "wagers that there was no partitive in Proto-Uralic". (Unfortunately, my e-mail client is not Unicode-compatible, thus I wasn't able decode _kĹŤli_.)
> > but Erza Mordvin tuvo (due to a /u/ > /1/ > /i/ change) or Finnish > Is that PFU /u/? Can't seem to find the sound change. Or is /u/ Erzyan, > while /i/ is PU?
Since this lemma doesn't continues in Hungarian, I couldn't look up its PFU reconstruction in my sources (it was only an example in a textbook). But I found another one (notation by UPA using flying accents, @ = schwa, D = greek delta): Finnish lintu 'bird', Estonian lind vs. Lappish (Norwegian) lo,d'de, Cheremiss (Eastern) luDo 'duck', Vogul lo-nt 'goose', Hungarian lu'd < *FPU lunta. The first vowel is back in all FU languges (even Lappish) except Baltic-Finnic. This process -- simultaneous illabization and shift to front -- became more general in other Baltic-Finnic languages, e.g. we find az intermediate form in Estonian, cf. ko~va /k3va/ 'hard' ~ Finnish kova, in Livonian /k3viSt/ 'whetstone' ~ Finnish kovasin. In Livonian dialects we can find the whole sequence, cf. /siu(v)/ < /s3u(v)/ < /syuv/ 'sommer' ~ Finnish suvi. This it seems that this process started to develop -- mainly before nasals and /v/ -- in the southern area of the Baltic-Finnic group and it spread northwards (but became improductive before its complete development).

Reply

vehke <vaksje@...>