Re: Unilang: the Grammar
From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
Date: | Thursday, April 26, 2001, 14:02 |
Hi!
SuomenkieliMaa <suomenkieli@...> writes:
> If I may butt in, to the person writing on Tyl-Sjok,
> why is it that you decided on making simple concepts
> like "come/go" into long phrases as you said
> ("move-use-foot"). Is it to resemble Mandarin or
> something? Just curious...
For various reasons:
- the language should be isolating, and I thought
that a concept of `go' and `come' is merely the same
with some variation, so it should be composed.
The problem is, of course, to decide where to stop
decomposing concepts...
- the language is supposed to be some kind of
proto-language for unbelievably complicated
languages yet to come. These will use a lot
of contraction to derive words from their
constructed ancestor, Tyl-Sjok.
By using composition now, I'll be able to
`compute' new stems in offspring languages.
- the language is meant to be (almost overly)
ambiguous. So usually, you simply don't use
the long phrase for `to come', but mere use
`to move'.
**Henrik
Replies