Re: Unilang: the Grammar
From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
Date: | Thursday, April 26, 2001, 13:36 |
Hi!
Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> writes:
> > So, you can freely combine "come" or "go" optionally with a direction,
> > or a mode of motion, or both. I 've never thought about it before, but
> > this system seems rather neat and elegant to me. Anywyay, just thought
> > I'd share.
> >
>
> What a neat system!!! I love it! Maybe I'll borrow it for a future conlang of
> mine? :))
I like that too. I'm still thinking about how to make it nice in
Tyl-Sjok which does not allow compositions like that. You need to
use auxiliaries for place, time and manner.
Currently, `to walk' translates `move use foot'. And `Peter runs into
the house' would be `Peter fast move use foot arrive-at X interior'.
But that's so long! Probably `move' would be dropped, but that
doesn't help too much. Furthermore, it's a but inconsistent to allow
`fast' direct modification, but not `foot'. Hmm...
I don't know how my language works. I need more investigation. :-(
> BTW, is Chinese as strict as Japanese when it comes to choose between "come" and
> "go", or is it more liberal like English or French?
Hmm. What do you mean? Like using `go' not for the mere action but
for the result?
I go to the cinema.
This isn't possible in Chinese. You'd say:
wo3 qu4 kan4 dian1-ying3.
I go watch film.
The direct translation,
wo3 qu4 dian1-ying3-yuan3.
I go cinema.
would mean to go there, but not implying to watch a film.
But the other usages I found quite the same as in English:
ni3 gen3 wo3 lai2!
you with me come
Come with me!
ni3 dao4 wo3 zhe4-li3 lai2!
you to me here come.
Come to me!
ni3 dao4 ta1 na4-li3 qu4!
you to him/her there go.
Go to him!
wo3 qu4 guo4 tai2-wan1.
I go EXP Taiwan.
(EXP is an aspect marker for a completed action and a completed result)
I (once) went to Taiwan.
wo3 lai2 le0 tai2-wan1.
I go PERF Taiwan.
(PERF is an aspect marker for a completed action but a non-completed result)
I've come to Taiwan.
I hope I made no mistakes...
?? Or was the question about something completely different? :-)
**Henrik
Replies