Re: CONCULTURE: First thoughts on Ayeri calendar system

That sounds very reasonable to me.  I've decided that I can't comment too much
more on the area because I'm not esquisitely well versed on the subject, just
something that I happened to know a certain amount about and figured most
people on the list wouldn't.  Numerous good points have been made against some
points that I made, and I don't feel qualified enough to validate either side
at this point.  Though I do feel like a horse's ass for presenting arguments
which had very reasonable counter-arguments that should have been obvious to
me.  Ah well.

Quoting Simon Richard Clarkstone <s.r.clarkstone@...>:

> Erich Kummerfeld wrote:
> [snip]
> > Also, the more I think about it, the more sure I am that the main evidence
> for
> > the moon filtering out lots of "potential impactors" as I saw someone
> call
> > them is that the far side of the moon is far, far more cratered than the
> side
> > of the moon that we can observe from Earth (which, if you have looked at
> it
> > through a telescope or seen large pictures of it, is highly pockmarked).
> If
> > that isn't enough to convince you, then we will have to agree to
> disagree.
> I thought that that was due to the near side of the Moon having
> undergone volcanism _after_ most of the small bodies that would hit it
> had hit it, erasing many of the craters, and producing the "seas".
>
> Note: The other ("dark") side of the Moon _does_ get the same amount of
> light, but is called "dark" because its surface is made of darker rock.
>
> --
> Simon Richard Clarkstone
> s.r.cl*rkst*n*@durham.ac.uk / s*m*n_cl*rkst*n*@hotmail.com
>