Re: Tsuhon: tentative phonology

Hi!

Yoon Ha Lee <yl112@...> writes:
> What works, works.  :-p  I can attest that my spelling in Korean is
> atrocious, so at least you'd've spelled things right.  =^)
Hehe.  Actually, I wrote

   |____ | |     +---+ |
   |     | |     |   | |-
   |     |-|     +---+ |
   `---- | |      |
         | |      `----

on the post card. :-)  No problems with romanisation there.


> Classes end this week, then there's study week, then finals...somewhere
> in there I should be able to make progress on this admittedly wacky idea.
Usually it holds that wacky == interesting. :-)  Or would I otherwise
be reading this list???


> Believe me, I know I wasn't the only one in intro German who got
> confused.  I knew the declensions at one point but I'd have to really
> review them.  Latin actually gives me *less* trouble, and I think it may
> be because even though it feels like more combinations (probably around
> same to a few more?  I'm not sure how to count vocative, locative, the
> declension classes, etc.) they're more distinct.
I think so, too.  The few forms but the many positions seem much more
confusing than many forms in many positions as in Latin, Russian.


**Henrik

Reply