Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Dune Conlang

From:Lars Henrik Mathiesen <thorinn@...>
Date:Thursday, November 11, 1999, 15:54
> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 14:20:51 +0100 > From: "Grandsire, C.A." <grandsir@...> >=20 > FFlores wrote: > > How do you break _gesserit_ down? It looks absolutely non-Latin to me! > > (Plus, how do you *pronounce* it?)
> For me, it looks like an indicative pluperfect (from a third > conjugation verb, with irregular past) or something like this (maybe a > subjunctive imperfect). But my Latin classes are far away and it's just > a feeling. Ray, you're back now. Help us!
Subjunctive perfect is better. Lewis & Short have this to say: gero, gessi, gestum (Part. gen. plur. sync. gerentum, Plaut. Truc. 2.1.13; imper. ger, like dic, duc, fac, fer, Cat. 27.2), 3, v. a. [root gas-, to come, go; Zend, jah, jahaiti, come; gero (for geso), in caus. sense, to cause to come; cf. Gr. bastaz=F4, from bastos =3D gestus], to bear about with one, to bear, carry, to wear, have (in the lit. signif. mostly poet., not in Cic., C=E6s., Sall., or Quint.; but instead of it ferre, portare, vehere, sustinere, etc.; but in the trop. signif. freq. and class.). Another dictionary says gero (1) gerere gessi gestum. Lit. (1) [to carry , bear]; esp. [to wear]. (2) [to bear, give birth to]. Transf., [to carry about, display an appearance]; 'personam gerere', [to act a part]; 'se gerere', [to conduct oneself (with adv.); to carry about, entertain a feeling; to carry on, conduct, manage business]; 'res gestae', [exploits, esp. warlike exploits]. The breakdown is something like ges- s- es- i- t, stem-PERF-EXT-THEM-ACT/1S. The verb conjugation in Latin has been heavily remodeled from its IE precursors, and it is hard to say what the various bits meant originally; in the system as found, you just have to accept that this combination of bits means subj. perf. PERF -s- is originally an aorist marker. The 'EXT' -es- is found in the active system in ind. plusq. and subj. perf, imperf., and plusq. (twice); it may originally have been the root -es ("is") that got tucked in there. THEM is the thematic vowel that glues the stem to the ending. It is either -i-, -a-, or -e- depending on conjugation and tense, but it doesn't decide tense by itself. Finally, the ending indicates active voice, person and number. Pronounce /"ges:erit/. (In case you are wondering, the stem form ger- in present and infinitive is due to -s- > -r- between vowels).
> By the way, is there somewhere an online grammar of Latin? (with =
if
> possible even the actual phonology (-ies) of Latin, length marked of > words and everything possible)
Try <URL:http://perseus.csad.ox.ac.uk>. Dictionaries and morphological analysers for Greek and Latin under 'Text Tools & Lexica', and Allen and Greenough's classic grammar (including the chapters on prosody) hidden under 'Essays & Catalogs'. And lots of texts to try it all out on. Other resources at <URL:http://www.nd.edu/~archives/latgramm.htm>, including the unnamed dictionary that gave me the second definition above. Have fun. Lars Mathiesen (U of Copenhagen CS Dep) <thorinn@...> (Humour NOT marke= d)