Re: OT: YAHOO (was Re: AW: Hello!)
|From:||Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>|
|Date:||Saturday, April 26, 2003, 22:20|
En réponse à Stone Gordonssen :
>Yahoo has never been known to listen to anything but its financial
True. It didn't begin like that though (I happen to know a former colleague
of the guys who invented Yahoo. He work in my laboratory). But the first
creators sold it, and it became what we now know :(( .
>I know that I found it odd/frustrating when I was able to subscribe to and
>lurk on CONLANG & AUXLANG through YAHOO with no indication that the groups
>were merely archives rather than fully functional groups. Only due to my
>years in IT was I able to ascertain how to subscribe to CONLANG & AUXLANG.
Others simply contact other members, like a few did with me ;))) .
> If not, has anyone tried the
>polite option of changing the descriptive verbiage associated with these
>lists on YAHOO.
Only the listowner can do that, but this archive doesn't have a listowner
anymore, and Yahoo won't listen to anyone (the same problem exists with
Romanceconlang), and refuses even to erase this group. As long as they have
this attitude, the problem will stay the same.
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.