Re: A short passage.
From: | B. Garcia <madyaas@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, March 15, 2005, 8:55 |
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 03:40:33 -0500, Mike Ellis <nihilsum@...> wrote:
> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
> Sender: Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@...>
> Poster: Mike Ellis <nihilsum@...>
> Subject: Re: A short passage.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> B. Garcia wrote:
>
> >I thought about something just now. Would the passive verb form using
> >future tense be a good way to express "will be condemned"?
>
> Don't see why not. If your lang's passive conjugates like any other verb,
> you nicely avoid any 'to be'.
>
I thought I had it right. Thanks ;)
> >Hmm, perhaps I've got that wrong also. What ways can a language with
> >no verb for "to be" express "will be..."?
>
> "will become"?
Yes. Sorry, brain fart.
--
Inu payangyara unamey ati tal amariey ka sey, payangyara kria?
Yanaysatra sonataya atan inu jumoey ati atan matawsara jumoey ati.