En réponse à Daniel Andreasson Vpc-Work <daniel.andreasson@...>:
>
> I don't know. Perhaps my references weren't clear enough,
> or she was just too shy about it. Conlanging is a personal
> thing, you know. :)
>
Well, since I've never been secretive about it, it's difficult for me to
imagine that :) .
>
> Well, we didn't start bouncing around my apartment, we
> were both kinda calm.
Too bad, I kind of imagined you too bouncing a la Tigger ;))) .
But we are calm people. I think
> she liked it very much though, because she opened up
> completely and so did I.
>
Nice.
> (I *am* a fan of bouncing though. It just didn't seem
> right at that moment. :)
>
LOL.
> The best thing about all this is that I can talk to
> someone about conlanging. It is a rather big hobby
> of mine, and not being able to share it with someone,
> not even your girlfriend, is a bit sad. You know how
> it is. "What are you doing?" "Oh, I'm just writing some
> stuff". You wouldn't say "I'm creating a language and
> I'm proud of it as well!" At least I wouldn't.)
>
I would. In fact, I did already. My boyfriend, although not sharing my interest
at all, respects it because it is my interest :) .
>
> We'll see what more info I can give you. It'd be neat
> to give you some sentences.
Indeed!
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
It takes a straight mind to create a twisted conlang.