On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:58:46 +0200, Christophe Grandsire
<christophe.grandsire@...> wrote:
>En réponse à D Tse <exponent@...>:
[...]
>> Anyway, wasn't it agreed upon a while ago that things like conlangs
>> are open-ended and can't really be completed?
>>
>
>In lexicon it's true. But grammars are systems, and I think you can
complete a
>grammar. Of course, you can always refine some points, especially if your
>language has exceptions. But in general, you can complete a grammar.
Does there exist such thing as A Complete Grammar of English, I wonder? ;)
Basilius