Re: THEORY: questions

En réponse à Muke Tever <alrivera@...>:

>
> Hmm, I don't remember seeing that there.  (At least, on the list of
> universals[1].. is the list of universals different from the list of
> primitives?)
>
They don't list AND!! Is it not a universal? I mean, languages can lack the
word itself, but I don't think they can lack the idea of association.

Christophe.

http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr

Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.

Reply