Re: THEORY: questions

So basically I get:
People can't think of any natlang where native [h] has
become any other sound, only ones where it is lost.
Chinese [h] became [k] in early Japanese borrowings.
People's conlangs have [h] becoming [x], [k_h] and
[?h]

And I can basically do whatever I feel like if my
conlang loses its plurality and tense markers.

Rachel

______________________________________________________________________
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

Replies