Re: Gender (was: Homosexuality and gender identity)
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 15:18 |
Christophe Grandsire scripsit:
> You girls?! ;)))) (or "You dolls", as I've seen quite often the expression
> "guys and dolls" in the spam I receive on my hotmail address ;))) )
That seems very 1920s-1940s to me, at least outside porn contexts.
But yes, the desire to use "guys" for all-female groups probably reflects
the fact that all other forms are faintly (or greatly) demeaning.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com
Please leave your values Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel --Cordelia Vorkosigan