Jim Henry wrote:
> Mi logxas en urbo.
> I live in a city.
So "Mi logxas en urbon" is semantically ill-formed, because
"living in" is not a motion relationship?
> Mi iras en urbon.
> I go in city-TO = I go into a city.
So "Mi iras en urbo" means "I go (from point A to point B) within
a city"?
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)