Re: 100 Message Limit
From: | Eamon Graham <robertg@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 0:14 |
I don't know, seems kinda complicated to me, but I guess this could
be an argument in favor of the "specialised" workshops Yitzik and
Jan have been discussing. It takes away some of the heavy trafic
from CONLANG to groups for people who are specifically interested in
that particular area (are there any extraterrestrial conlang
groups? animal language groups?) and then one can share the results
of their work and findings with everyone on CONLANG. _Or_ if you
end up with a problem that you need everyone's input on. I hope
everyone sees what I mean, it's late here. :)
Cheers,
Eamon
> I assume I'm not the only one who tried posting and had the message returned
> because Conlang was over its 100-message limit for the day. And yes, I
> realize that this message won't get to you until tomorrow. But I'd like to
> know what you guys think of this idea - making a separate list that we all
> subscribed to, then we all just post new threads to whichever has less
> messages on it. That way, we'd have essentially double the message limit on
> a single list. We would put the notice in the list description that this is
> only half of a double list, and new members could join both accordingly.
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Joe Fatula
Replies