Re: 100 Message Limit
From: | Sally Caves <scaves@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 0:33 |
Why not simply ask the list manager to raise the quota? Is 100 the absolute
maximum that any list can manage in a day?
With two lists, we have difficulty cross-pollinating, if you know what I
mean. It's hard to keep threads to one topic or ask conlangers to
"specialize."
Sally
scaves@frontiernet.net
Eskkoat ol ai sendran, rohsan nuehra celyil takrem bomai nakuo.
"My shadow follows me, putting strange, new roses into the world."
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eamon Graham" <robertg@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: 100 Message Limit
> I don't know, seems kinda complicated to me, but I guess this could
> be an argument in favor of the "specialised" workshops Yitzik and
> Jan have been discussing. It takes away some of the heavy trafic
> from CONLANG to groups for people who are specifically interested in
> that particular area (are there any extraterrestrial conlang
> groups? animal language groups?) and then one can share the results
> of their work and findings with everyone on CONLANG. _Or_ if you
> end up with a problem that you need everyone's input on. I hope
> everyone sees what I mean, it's late here. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Eamon
>
> > I assume I'm not the only one who tried posting and had the message
returned
> > because Conlang was over its 100-message limit for the day. And yes, I
> > realize that this message won't get to you until tomorrow. But I'd like
to
> > know what you guys think of this idea - making a separate list that we
all
> > subscribed to, then we all just post new threads to whichever has less
> > messages on it. That way, we'd have essentially double the message
limit on
> > a single list. We would put the notice in the list description that
this is
> > only half of a double list, and new members could join both accordingly.
> > Any thoughts on this?
> >
> > Joe Fatula
>