Re: 100 Message Limit

--- Joseph Fatula <fatula3@...> wrote:

> I assume I'm not the only one who tried posting
> and had the message returned
> because Conlang was over its 100-message limit
> for the day.  And yes, I
> realize that this message won't get to you
> until tomorrow.  But I'd like to
> know what you guys think of this idea - making
> a separate list that we all
> subscribed to, then we all just post new
> threads to whichever has less
> messages on it.
That would make about a dozen conlang related
lists to subscribe to. You'd actually have to pay
attention to which lists have what threads and
who's going to reach its limit first. If you post
to Conlang-B, and I'm not subscribed, I'll never
hear what you had to say, when you could just
post here and let the system work itself out.

> That way, we'd have
> essentially double the message limit on
> a single list.
And double the messages in our inboxes because
people will inevitably cc to one or the other on
the assumption that Conlang will reach its limit.

I for one am willing to wait for tomorrow to get
the backlog rather than try to deal with another
list. I'm also not especially willing to
subscribe to an extended Conlang list when this
list, while inconvenient in its 100 message
limit, is not broken anymore.

Padraic.


=====
fas peryn omen c' yng ach h-yst yn caleor peryn ndia;
enffoge yn omen ach h-yst yn caleor per la gouitha.




.