Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Swedish Chinese

From:Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
Date:Tuesday, February 3, 2004, 12:08
Quoting Pavel Iosad <edricson@...>:

> Hello, > > > >What are they? I only know about [ok]. > > > > Rather make that ["ok3\]... > > Ah. > > > > Well, unless you count the > > >[u]-or-whatever in [kvIn:ur] as a spelling pronunciation (which it, > > >AFAIU, historically is) > > > > _Att, av, och_ all used to be /o/, > > _att_ and _och_ as [o] are surely something I've heard not once.
Really? That rather surprises me, act'ly, esply the later.
> > _till_ used to be /ti/ or /te/, _vid_ (prep.) /ve/ etc. > > Umm, _vid_ is [vI] for us students. Also _bredvid_ [brEv:I].
[brEv:I]? That sounds quite odd to me, since my 'lect only has short stressed vowel + /v/ in a couple funky loans like _kaviar_ ['kavjar`]. Or did you mean [bre:vI]? I say ['bre:vE], or, when in formal mood, ['bre:vId].
> > <rant> but the worst by far is the _-ade_ verb > > preterite, which historically was only [a]. > > But _sa_ and _la_ are kosher even in "proper" Swedish, aren't they?
They would be avoided in "serious" writing, if your speaking of the spelling. Practically no-one is saying [sA:dE], [lA:dE], however.
> > Another thing is the ridicule directed at those who preserve a > > distinct feminine gender. > > What is it? Do you mean the *distinction* between masculine and > feminine, as in _den gode riddaren_ vs. _den goda kvinnan_? Or something > else?
I'm not sure what BP is refering to, but I, when in an illiberal mood, stigmatize not making that distinction.
> BTW, is it true that some lects have [stu:g] for _stod_ because no other > preterite ends in [d], but plenty of them are in [g] (drog, log etc.)?
Can confirm the fact, but not the explanation. Another preterite in /-d/ would be _skred_ "strode". However, [stu:g] could still be in analog with _drog_ et sim, since these words all add a consonant in the preterite - can't think of any other that adds /d/. (it's skrida, skred, skridit, with the /d/ in all forms.) My idiolect is vaciliating on this point - I probably say [stu:d] most of the time, but [stu:g] and [stu:] may also be heard. Andreas

Reply

Pavel Iosad <edricson@...>