Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: USAGE: (Mis)Naming a Language

From:Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>
Date:Thursday, October 28, 2004, 19:11
The distinction for me is that |Latin| has neither a [d] NOR a [t]
(except in careful speech, when it has the latter); it has a [?].   It's
true that in American, intervocalic /t/ normally goes to [d]; we have a
[d] in "bottle", not a [?].  But there are exceptions, mostly words that
end in /t@n/ ~ /tn=/: Latin, satin, gratin, button, mutton, etc, all
have [?] for the /t/.  For me, the vocalic n is not the issue, as I also
have one of those after [d] in words like Aladdin, Madden, McFadden,
hidden, sodden, etc.

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 02:19:40PM -0400, Kit La Touche wrote:
> i think the real issue is one of both syllables being in the same metrical > foot: [l&?n=] for "latin" and something like [l&4n=] for "ladin" - the > latter is definitely voiced. > > hm. saying "latter" ([l&d@r\]) makes me think it might not be feet after > all, but the syllabic n, as charlie points out. but i'm *definitely* not > using any [}] in what i'm saying. > > curious. > > -kit > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, caeruleancentaur wrote: > > > In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Carsten Becker <naranoieati@B...> wrote: > > >>Heh, you Americans would pronounce "Ladin" and "Latin" the same when > > >>speaking uncarefully ["l&:4In], wouldn't you? > > Not me! I'm a bit of a neophyte with x-sampa, but let's see what I > > can come up with. > > > > ladin is /l{d}n=/ > > > > latin is /l{t}n=/ > > > > I'm trying to show that the d and t are begun with the tongue against > > the alveolus, but there is no oral release of air. Instead the > > center of the tongue seems to rise to the palate to form the n and > > the air is released through the nose. /I/ is never heard. > > > > The minimal pairs maddens/matins, sadden/satin are produced in the > > same way, mutatis mutandis. > > > > I believe that Carsten is basing his supposition on the American > > practice of voicing intervocal voiceless consonants, e.g., latter > > =ladder. But in this case there is no intervocal voicing since there > > are not two vowels involved. There is the /{/, but there is no /I/. > > > > Charlie