From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html wrote:
>=20
> Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 05/08/99 23:00:40 , tu as =E9crit :
>=20
> ever heard of Eurotra ?
> >
> > Reductionism isn't what we want to do.
>=20
> wasting billions isn't what european taxpayers wanted either.
Oh, they'd just waste it some other way.
Now there is UNL and C-STAR and XML.
The vodka is still good and the meat rottener. [1]
> > I'm just trying to figure out how to SVO without tripping.
> > Since SVO is child's play, no need for metaphysical roles.
>=20
> it's not metaphysical. it's just what's in your brain.
> or rather in mine. dunno about yours. picking accurate V2
> depends on that analysis.
I had to get an MRI; and they found nothing.
You are right about V2 (preposition) accuracy.
And sometimes accuracy is very desireable.
> don't underestimate children's brain and don't overrate
> computers' pain.
My job is to give pain to computers. People are so lazy/efficient
they bypass accuracy, so programs must really understand the
whole sentence before the individual words.
> in my world sword, shield and the like don't necessarily
> derive from verbs. they may just be instruments : mediums, tools,
> food, etc. and you may derive verbs from them if you like it :-)
I think it is really best to derive everything from adjectives.
[1] Old machine translation joke; "Spirit is willing but flesh is weak".