Re: CHAT: F.L.O.E.S.
| From: | Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, March 3, 2004, 8:07 |
|---|
Quoting "Douglas Koller, Latin & French" <latinfrench@...>:
> >So 'sh' and 'hy' contrast - [s\] vs [C]? IIRC it was said that 'sh' was
> [s\]
> >in the last YAJPT, but that's one fine distinction!
>
> I don't know what [s\] is, but there is a distinction. For me, point
> of articulation differences and part of tongue used differences mark
> the distinction (neither apical). Similar, sure, but not a difficult
> distinction.
Waitaminit! If 'sh' isn't apical, it can't be [S] as Christophe says, since
that's supposed to be apical. Restored to default status: confused.
Andreas
Reply