Re: German question
From: | caeruleancentaur <caeruleancentaur@...> |
Date: | Thursday, September 1, 2005, 12:32 |
--- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Carsten Becker <naranoieati@B...>
wrote:
>Why do those anglophones always have to omit diacritics? If you
want >to have it without the dots, it's _Peenemuende_, since ä=ae,
ö=oe, >ü=ue and ß=ss in German unfriendly environments.
Off the top of my head I'd say it's because umlauts have no meaning
for most Anglophones. The particular rounded vowel in question is
not a part of our phonemic inventory. We are quickly abandoning the
use of other diacritics as well. You seldom see examples such as
_fiancée_ or _coöperate_ anymore. I'd be really surprised to
see
someone write _naïveté_!!! Lord, it's got TWO of them! With
all
the spelling "problems" in English as it is, what's the loss of a
few diacritical marks?
Please note that I'm answering the question posed above. I'm not
arguing for or against the practice.
Charlie
http://wiki.frath.net/user:caeruleancentaur