Re: OT: sorta OT: cases: please help...
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Sunday, December 9, 2001, 4:28 |
Quoting Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg.rhiemeier@...>:
> And even in languages like English that don't do this, grammar is not
> entirely blind to such matters. Ever tried to passivize a stative
> verb (a verb denoting a state rather an action)? Try, and you'll
> see what I mean.
Well, you'd be surprised. My Georgian professor (whose big thing
is grammatical relations) has written an article on this subject:
Howard Aronson. "English as an active language". 1977.
Lingua, 41:201-216.
I haven't read the article, and I'm not sure that I buy the
apparent claim, but FWIW he has made a plausible sounding case to
me before that English is *not* a nominative/accusative language.
(I, personally, would be scared to publish an article with
that title without first getting some protection from the FBI.
Certainly, the hate-mail would reach the heavens.)
=====================================================================
Thomas Wier <trwier@...> <http://home.uchicago.edu/~trwier>
"...koruphàs hetéras hetére:isi prosápto:n /
Dept. of Linguistics mú:tho:n mè: teléein atrapòn mían..."
University of Chicago "To join together diverse peaks of thought /
1010 E. 59th Street and not complete one road that has no turn"
Chicago, IL 60637 Empedocles, _On Nature_, on speculative thinkers