Re: OT: sorta OT: cases: please help...
From: | David Peterson <digitalscream@...> |
Date: | Thursday, December 6, 2001, 9:55 |
In a message dated 12/6/01 12:42:43 AM, anstouh@YAHOO.COM.AU writes:
<< Well, being is something that you do, so you could argue it is one. >>
Huh. I think being could be something you do, but even if you're not
doing it, you still are; seems like it could go either way. I could do
nothing and still be. In fact, I'd have to do something pretty forceful in
order not to be. This, however, is branching on the philosophic: Is being
passive or active or neither or both? I'd go for the last one.
-David
"Zi hiwejnat zodZaraDatsi pat Zi mirejsat dZaCajani sUlo."
"The future's uncertain and the end is always near."
--Jim Morrison
Reply