Re: new Unnamed Conlang
From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
Date: | Monday, September 20, 2004, 7:27 |
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 16:54:10 -0400, J. 'Mach' Wust
<j_mach_wust@...> wrote:
> we use ['?m=?m=]
> or ['?@?@] for negation and [?m='hm=] or [?@'h@] for affirmation even though
> our words can't have [m=], [?], or stressed [@].
No [?]? Interesting; I thought this was a fairly universal German thing.
Or do you mean "no word-medial [?]", perhaps? Though I have it in e.g.
|erinnern| and in |beinhalten|.
And I also have [m=] in words such as |geben| ["ge:bm=].
Cheers,
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
Watch the Reply-To!