Re: The Language Code, take 2 (or 3)

Garth Wallace ikrí:


> > It applies also to other conlangs; cf. Wenedyk, Shemspreg, Brithenig &c.
> > Though these are a special sort of historically plausible a posteriori,
> > not mere eclectical aposteriorism.
>
> Maybe there should be a few options? Naturalistic a priori,
> philosophical a priori, ad hoc a posteriori, "scientific"/"historically
> plausible" a posteriori. And maybe a way of specifying the language
> family or parent language if applicable (not sure how concreoles should
> be handled).
Being myself a person who just loves "scientific"/"historically plausible" a
posteriori and naturalistic a priori conlangs, I consider this suggestion very
useful.

~~~~~~Yitzik~~~~~~