Re: CHAT: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)

John Cowan
> Stephen DeGrace scripsit:
>
> > *No* thank you, con-IALs are
> > fun to discuss as an exercise in intellectual
> > masturbation (isn't that what we're doing anyway? And
> > what's wrong with masturbation hehe...)
>
> No.  In the old days, conlanging was intellectual masturbation.
> With the arrival of this list, it has become intellectual
> *intercourse*.
O how excellent an epigram! It should become the motto of
our list.

--And.